Conversion levers exist where the event is transactional, and vanish where it is behavioural
15 / 28
All of Segment 4 has a defined LC — submitted, approved, signed, walked, funded, closed. Those stops are events, so the lever names itself.
Every gap sits in Segments 1–3 and 5, where the conversion is a behaviour rather than a transaction. Six are missing outright: A1 · 04 · A2 · A4 · 21 · 23.
Two of those six are the most valuable conversions in the business. A2 — showing up: a booked appointment becoming a physical arrival, the largest leak in Segment 2, and the journey map itself flags show rate as not surfaced. And 21 — first trip completed, which is the North Star.
So the chain can describe everything about closing a deal, and almost nothing about getting someone through the door or getting them camping.
Nothing is in production
0 / 24
No stop scores defined on Built. Eleven have a prototype — the portal app, the Floor Workspace check-in wizard, six competing MCP surfaces, a desking prototype, a walkthrough capture tool, and the internet-lead experiment harness. Thirteen have no surface at all.
The inversion is the finding. Segment 4 is the only fully measured block in the chain and it contains zero surfaces — 13 through 20 are entirely unbuilt. Segment 3, the least finished on measurement, holds almost every prototype that exists. So the chain measures most precisely exactly where nobody can do anything, and is built most heavily where the numbers are thinnest.
Stop 17 remains the sharpest single cell: every metric exists, the CIT Tracker covers it, it carries a universal requirement — and it has no screen. Stop 21, the North Star, has no surface and no capture event.
The mechanism works: answering L1 fills L2 for free
4 / 8
Three L1 answers assigned four of the eight agents without anyone doing an L2 pass. Signal Detection and Clarity fell out of 01; Information Collection and Decision Support fell out of 02.
This is why L1 goes first even though L2 is the larger gap. L2 cannot be specified before L1 says what needs understanding — an agent with nothing to present is just a name.
L2 is still empty across every stop past 03
21 / 24
The roster is fully specified — goal, bounded authority, tools, feedback loops. Twenty-one stops have no agent mapped, so every “the system handles this” in the fulfillment column remains an intention.
L1 is a boundary everywhere it is not yet answered
Every stop has exit criteria. Eighteen still do not define what the customer needs to understand. The hesitation ledger is the only pre-existing content and it clusters on 08–11 and E1.
Measurement and screens remain inversely distributed
Segment 4 is fully measured and barely built. Stop 17 is the sharpest case: the CIT Tracker is its primary dashboard, every metric exists — and it has no screen, no chunk, while being a universal requirement.
Segment 2 is the reverse — with two corrections as of 2026-08-19. The dashboards reaching 04 and 05 count leads rather than qualifying, pricing or timing them \u2014 which is why 04’s L4 was rescored partial on 2026-08-19. And these stops are not surfaceless: the internet-lead-to-appointment experiment harness runs both, emitting server-side events already. It is a harness, not a product — but “no surface at all” was wrong.
Both ends of the chain are still the thinnest
Gates A1 and A4 have no metric and no dashboard. E1 has zero measurement. Segment 5 has one partial L4 across three stops. Every one is a place a customer enters, leaves, or stops being counted.